EPIC V. APPLE On December 31, 2020, the Epic v. Apple dispute we’ve discussed previously continued with the magistrate judge ruling that Apple did not need to produce documents that only involve Apple’s activities outside the U.S. The magistrate found “extraterritorial conduct not directed at the U.S. cannot be a basis for liability,” even though Epic is alleging that Apple has a monopoly on a global market. It seems that during the briefing and hearing on the matter Epic was less than convincing on the question of relevance. From the order:
Miscellaneous January Updates
Miscellaneous January Updates
Miscellaneous January Updates
EPIC V. APPLE On December 31, 2020, the Epic v. Apple dispute we’ve discussed previously continued with the magistrate judge ruling that Apple did not need to produce documents that only involve Apple’s activities outside the U.S. The magistrate found “extraterritorial conduct not directed at the U.S. cannot be a basis for liability,” even though Epic is alleging that Apple has a monopoly on a global market. It seems that during the briefing and hearing on the matter Epic was less than convincing on the question of relevance. From the order: